Matthew Engel asked pertinently in his 2006 Wisden notes what the prime
purpose of a first-class county cricket club should be. To win trophies, to
provide entertainment for members, to enhance cricket within the county, to
provide players for the England team, to make money, or all of these? The
latter is the answer, but I am getting increasingly worried by the obsession
with the first of them. In particular the pathetic dependence of coaches on
Kolpak players.
Overseas players by another name, they have come to England and Wales in
such numbers that they are now certainly having a negative effect on what is
arguably the most important of county cricket's raison d'etres, namely
unearthing, developing and nurturing talented young home-bred players, some
of whom will one day enhance the England side.
In last year's Almanack my own son, who has had a decent all-round start to
this season in his benefit year with Sussex (ironically helped by the fact
that he has been given the new ball because one so-called "British"
Australian fast bowler decided that he was not British after all) wrote a
well-argued defence of the influx of the Kolpaks. They are so called, lest
anyone has forgotten, because a Slovak handball player of that name
established a legal precedent (or so it has been interpreted) that
professional sportsmen whose country of origin has a trade agreement with a
country in the European Union cannot be refused employment because of a
restriction on the number of foreign players imposed by the rules of a
sporting body like the ECB.
But no one has satisfactorily explained to me why Kolpak players have to be employed. If counties did not offer them contracts they could not be accused of
discrimination. In fact, they are coming here in ever increasing numbers,
mainly from a cricket circuit in South Africa that is being gradually
stripped by the voluntary migration of most of the best of its white
players. County coaches employ them because they think that thereby they
will have a better chance of winning trophies.
They are not all Kolpaks. At Warwickshire, Ashley Giles, who has mixed priorities as a new coach and new England selector, has chosen Monde Zondeki as an official overseas player. He already has Jonathan Trott, who has qualified for England despite being
viewed in Cape Town, where he grew up, as a future South Africa international.
Because there is promotion and relegation involved in the highly competitive
County Championship and because there are still three one-day tournaments,
giving the season its feeling of relentlessness, the coaches are forever
having to bolster the resources that have emerged from their own academies.
They are reluctant to give responsibility to their own young players because
the grass always seems to look greener to them beyond their own fence.
Significantly, too, the imported players are relatively cheap to employ.
Despite the IPL, there seems to be no end to the supply. When Lancashire
lost Brad Hodge to the Indian league for five weeks, they wasted no time in
replacing him with Mohammad Yousuf. Sussex have now signed Corey Collymore,
who managed 11 wickets at 43 runs each in England for West Indies
last year and was left out of the one-day team. He is hardly the sharp
spearhead they were trying to find for their attack, in response to the loss
of Ryan Harris. The younger, faster, if less experienced Harris was
registered on a British passport thanks to having a Leicester-born father,
only to renege on a sworn affidavit that he would not play in Australia
except as an overseas player.
Robin M-J said in his Wisden article that the Kolpaks had been, in effect, a
third "overseas" player. But what chance has local youth when that becomes a
fourth, fifth and sixth overseas player too? Last week Leicestershire
fielded six South Africans in their XI. One of their young, locally
educated batsmen, Matthew Boyce, who used to open the batting for Oakham
School with Stuart Broad under the coaching of Frank Hayes and David Steele,
has actually found a way into the side this season and done very well so
far, as has the young wicketkeeper Tom New in his new role as an opening
batsman. But how many other homegrown talents might prosper, given an
extended chance to do so?
The Kolpaks had been, in effect, a
third "overseas" player. But what chance has local youth when that becomes a
fourth, fifth and sixth overseas player too?
The ECB has given evidence, along with the Rugby Union, to the European
Court in an attempt to argue that they have a right to preserve the
interests of their sport by being able to insist on a given number of
England qualified players, but a spokesman last week said that they "were
not holding their breath" that anything would come of it. The "Performance
Related Fee Payments" by which the ECB sought to encourage counties to field
home qualified cricketers, are clearly not nearly sufficient incentive to
force their hands.
County cricket is, like the IPL, a melting pot of different races, and in
some ways it is all the better for it. Young talent does still emerge, too.
On Sunday spectators at Old Trafford could see seven current and former England
internationals playing in the Friends Provident Trophy match between
Lancashire Lightning and the defending champions, Durham Dynamos - Andrew
Flintoff, James Anderson, Mal Loye, Paul Collingwood, Steve Harmison, Graham
Onions and Phil Mustard, not to mention the South African Neil McKenzie, the
West Indian Gareth Breese, and the two prolific Australians Stuart Law and
Michael Di Venuto. Happily, it was a 23-year-old Lancastrian, Steven Croft,
who hit the six that won the rain-ravaged match.
I accept the point that experienced professionals from overseas - whether
they come to England under the guise of "overseas" players (only one now
allowed), Kolpak imports, or as overseas-bred cricketers who have British or
European passports - can help young players develop. Also that the best
English professionals will still be chosen, and in some cases improved, by
the increased competition.
Leicestershire's chairman, Neil Davidson, and their coach, Tim Boon, claim that the course they have taken is the only one open to them if they are to compete against clubs with far more money than they have, such as Surrey, who only resorted to a Kolpak player for the first time this season. Pedro Collins is doing well, in company with their
other main fast bowlers, the South Africa-born Jade Dernbach, Matt
Nicholson from Australia, and Chris Jordan from Barbados. But Surrey were
themselves bowled out on Monday by a Kent attack whose wicket-takers
consisted of two Pakistan Test players and two South Africans. There must,
surely, be a critical mass.
Christopher Martin-Jenkins has been a leading cricket broadcaster, journalist and author for almost four decades, during which time he has served as a cricket correspondent for the BBC, the Daily Telegraph and the Times
I write as an ex-County cricketer not good enough to play for England!.Has not the time come for a total reorganisation of the First Class game in England/Wales ? With the advent of Central Contracts the county game is bereft of all its England 'stars' for most of the season.This results in aspiring England players not being tested to the highest standards.
We need 8 'area' sides ,as is the case in virtually all other Test playing countries. It would not be too difficult to combine groups of counties-after all, many clubs are having to amalgamate.
The Minor Counties are not allowed to select anyone not qualified to play for England and quite rightly so. Can the FCC not be banned from selecting non-England qualified players-with the emphasis on' selecting'?
Posted by JamesButtler on May 08 2008, 06:47 AM GMT
I note the point raised by The_Phantom (below) about Kolpaks in Yorkshire. I'd like to point out that Gerard Brophy is not a Kolpak and plays under a British passport as both of his parents are from Belfast.
Posted by runn on May 07 2008, 23:28 PM GMT
Like most people in the UK, the first thing to do when shit hits the fan is to blame the immigrants...or rest of the world! Typical...be a real sports man and an example to your son, stop being so afraid of the competition!!
Posted by r1m2 on May 07 2008, 22:28 PM GMT
This sounds like the "foreigners taking jobs away from our local folks" type of complaint. I suppose if foreigners are good enough to take jobs away from the locals, the locals ought to be jobless or look for some other means of making a living. Best of luck to poor english lads... :P
Posted by SvenMoores on May 07 2008, 20:07 PM GMT
Does England have 180 English born and bred cricketers good enough to play first class cricket to a high enough standard that will prove a good testing ground for aspiring young English cricketers? Surely not.
CMJ needs to get with the times and realise that the County game is now a much harder testing ground for young players. Leicester are on the right track, the best "young" players will play but they will have good pros to learn from around them. Can you deny Ackerman and Dipenaar have something to offer young players?
Surrey, one of the most successful clubs in recent years, so many English players in the team yet how many are going to realistically standing a chance to play for England? Newman and Jordan (if he picks England) so I ask, how is that difference from Boyce, Boyce and Malik at Leics? Let's be honest, Ramps, Butch, Usman, etc not going to play for England again.
Posted by neilsrini on May 07 2008, 20:02 PM GMT
County cricket is in trouble. Its a tired and boring format which nobody wants to watch. As a breeding ground it is useless. Full of average players like Elham and Martin-Jenkins. All average triers who linger on stopping young talent, while themselves being nowhere near the grade required to change English cricket. These guys belong in league cricket and should not be stopping young talent from playing. The picture on the front of the great Malcolm Marshall is a saddening hark back to the hey day of county cricket, when Marshall, Richards and any number of stars from the Windies and beyond graced these shores and made for fierce competition. With the advent of the IPL county cricket is dead in the water. What truly big star would waste time in county cricket when he could play in the IPL? Shane Warne is such and example and young English talent is deprived of learning from the greatest. With lingerers around the talent pool is so poor that third rate Kolpak players are the only hope.
Posted by icecream_snow on May 07 2008, 20:01 PM GMT
The point is that if Leicestershire (or Sussex for that matter) have failed to produce a quality English test player in the last 20 years, then Kolpak won't make much difference eitherway. The question ought to be how can Durham, the 18th county, produce Collingwood, Harmison and Plunkett yet so many other counties remain barren?
The main players from England team will continue to come from the counties with quality grass roots initatives, and over the last twenty years the backbone of the England team has come from the Yorkshire/Lancashire/Surrey/Essex axis.
Posted by Flymogram on May 07 2008, 19:15 PM GMT
I agree with what CMJ I saying. The argument that the domestic game would be boring withoy Kolpaks is nonsense. The influx needs to be stopped sooner rather than later, otherwise we'll have the same situation as football where so many foreign players play and home grown players don't get the chance. This is why the national football side is so poor.
Posted by The_Phantom on May 07 2008, 18:35 PM GMT
Actually I disagree with most of the other comments here. I think it's not county veterans who are being displaced by kolpaks, it's younger players who are losing valuable experience. I'm a Yorkshire supporter and our kolpaks (Rudolph, Brophy and Kruis) are not displacing 'old' pros like Gough and White, they're displacing younger players like who are, or have been on the fringe of the team, like Shahzad and Gale. Well, I suppose displace is not the right word, they're denying younger players the chance to break their way into the team. So what, you may cry. Well, I actually like watching players develop over several seasons rather than kolpaks come and go. I actually like seeing players progress through the Yorkshire academy and go on to represent their county rather than guys who are, at the end of the day, only really doing it for the money and would much rather be back in SA or Aus playing cricket for the same money if they could.
Posted by On-Drive on May 07 2008, 18:31 PM GMT
Support free market approach with a reasonable limit. English Cricket in the early 80s started going down and that started by putting a limit on the number of foreign players. You cannot have a quality competition by restricting quality players. With out quality players you cannot produce quality english players. I would say have 4-5 foreign players per team.
If you liked this article and would like to share it with others on the web who might be searching for good content on
cricket, you may use these buttons. When you add them to any of these sites, you "social bookmark" them for others to find and rate. More on del.icio.us>> More on digg>> More on stumbleupon>>
Christopher Martin-Jenkins A useful cricketer himself in his time, Christopher Martin-Jenkins was employed on the Cricketer by EW Swanton on leaving Cambridge. He joined the BBC sports team in 1970 and commentated on his first international match, an ODI, in 1972. The following year he succeeded Brian Johnston as the BBC's cricket correspondent, a post he held until 1990, with a four-year break between 1981 and 1984 during which time he edited the Cricketer. He left the BBC in 1990 to become the cricket correspondent of the Daily Telegraph, and switched to the Times in 1998 – a position he held till 2007. He has been a member of the Test Match Special team since 1973, again with a break between 1981 and 1985, when he was used on BBC TV. He is also a prolific author, and his accounts of the 1973-74 West Indies tour, Testing Time, and the 1974-75 series in Australia, Assault On The Ashes, set the tone for more than three decades of quality output.